On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 4:06 PM Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Add support of clock adaptation for AXI GPIO driver. > Please make the commit message more specific. I can tell from the patch that it's about power management but I've never heard anyone referring to it as clock adaptation. There's also a lot of runtime pm code in here. Be more descriptive. > Signed-off-by: Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Changes in V2: > Add check for return value of platform_get_irq() API. > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c > index 67f9f82e0db0..d103613e787a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c > @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@ > #include <linux/io.h> > #include <linux/gpio/driver.h> > #include <linux/slab.h> > +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > +#include <linux/clk.h> Alphabetical order of includes? > > /* Register Offset Definitions */ > #define XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET (0x0) /* Data register */ > @@ -38,6 +40,7 @@ > * @gpio_state: GPIO state shadow register > * @gpio_dir: GPIO direction shadow register > * @gpio_lock: Lock used for synchronization > + * @clk: clock resource for this driver > */ > struct xgpio_instance { > struct gpio_chip gc; > @@ -45,7 +48,8 @@ struct xgpio_instance { > unsigned int gpio_width[2]; > u32 gpio_state[2]; > u32 gpio_dir[2]; > - spinlock_t gpio_lock[2]; > + spinlock_t gpio_lock[2]; /* For serializing operations */ This looks like it was sneaked into an unrelated patch. > + struct clk *clk; > }; > > static inline int xgpio_index(struct xgpio_instance *chip, int gpio) > @@ -256,6 +260,83 @@ static void xgpio_save_regs(struct xgpio_instance *chip) > chip->gpio_dir[1]); > } > > +static int xgpio_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) > +{ > + int ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(chip->parent); > + > + /* > + * If the device is already active pm_runtime_get() will return 1 on > + * success, but gpio_request still needs to return 0. > + */ > + return ret < 0 ? ret : 0; > +} > + > +static void xgpio_free(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) > +{ > + pm_runtime_put(chip->parent); > +} > + > +static int __maybe_unused xgpio_suspend(struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev); > + struct irq_data *data; > + int irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > + > + if (irq < 0) { > + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "platform_get_irq returned %d\n", irq); > + return irq; > + } > + > + data = irq_get_irq_data(irq); > + if (!irqd_is_wakeup_set(data)) > + return pm_runtime_force_suspend(dev); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int __maybe_unused xgpio_resume(struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev); > + struct irq_data *data; > + int irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > + > + if (irq < 0) { > + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "platform_get_irq returned %d\n", irq); > + return irq; > + } No, don't do this on every suspend/resume - just call platform_get_irq() in probe() and store the irq number for later use. This way you only check it once. Also why would you log the return value? > + > + data = irq_get_irq_data(irq); > + > + if (!irqd_is_wakeup_set(data)) > + return pm_runtime_force_resume(dev); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int __maybe_unused xgpio_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev); > + struct xgpio_instance *gpio = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + > + clk_disable(gpio->clk); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int __maybe_unused xgpio_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev); > + struct xgpio_instance *gpio = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + > + return clk_enable(gpio->clk); > +} > + > +static const struct dev_pm_ops xgpio_dev_pm_ops = { > + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(xgpio_suspend, xgpio_resume) > + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(xgpio_runtime_suspend, > + xgpio_runtime_resume, NULL) > +}; > + > /** > * xgpio_of_probe - Probe method for the GPIO device. > * @pdev: pointer to the platform device > @@ -324,6 +405,8 @@ static int xgpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > chip->gc.direction_output = xgpio_dir_out; > chip->gc.get = xgpio_get; > chip->gc.set = xgpio_set; > + chip->gc.request = xgpio_request; > + chip->gc.free = xgpio_free; > chip->gc.set_multiple = xgpio_set_multiple; > > chip->gc.label = dev_name(&pdev->dev); > @@ -334,15 +417,38 @@ static int xgpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return PTR_ERR(chip->regs); > } > > + chip->clk = devm_clk_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "s_axi_aclk"); > + if (IS_ERR(chip->clk)) { > + if (PTR_ERR(chip->clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER) > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Input clock not found\n"); How is this an error if the clock is optional? > + return PTR_ERR(chip->clk); > + } > + status = clk_prepare_enable(chip->clk); > + if (status < 0) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to prepare clk\n"); > + return status; > + } > + pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev); > + status = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev); > + if (status < 0) > + goto err_unprepare_clk; > + > xgpio_save_regs(chip); > > status = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &chip->gc, chip); > if (status) { > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to add GPIO chip\n"); > - return status; > + goto err_pm_put; > } > > + pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev); > return 0; > +err_pm_put: > + pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev); > +err_unprepare_clk: > + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev); > + clk_unprepare(chip->clk); > + return status; > } > > static const struct of_device_id xgpio_of_match[] = { > @@ -357,6 +463,7 @@ static struct platform_driver xgpio_plat_driver = { > .driver = { > .name = "gpio-xilinx", > .of_match_table = xgpio_of_match, > + .pm = &xgpio_dev_pm_ops, > }, > }; > > -- > 2.7.4 > Bart