On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 11:31:58AM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 06:05:10PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 3:12 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + dev_dbg(&gdev->dev, "registered chardev handle for line %d\n", > > > > > + offset); > > > > > > > > Perhaps tracepoint / event? > > > > > > > > > > Again, a cut-and-paste from V1, and I have no experience with > > > tracepoints or events, so I have no opinion on that. > > > > > > So, yeah - perhaps? > > > > > > > I think it's a good idea to add some proper instrumentation this time > > other than much less reliable logs. Can you take a look at > > include/trace/events/gpio.h? Adding new GPIO trace events should be > > pretty straightforward by copy-pasti... drawing inspiration from > > existing ones. > > > > You only want tracepoints to replace those dev_dbg()s, so when a line > is requested? What about the release? Any other points? > Had a closer look and it seems to me that the correct place to add such tracepoints would be gpiod_request() and gpiod_free(), so they catch all requests, not just the cdev ones. And that moves it outside the scope of this patch. I personally don't have any use for the dev_dbg()s here and am happy to remove them - they were only there to match the behaviour of linehandle_create as closely as possible. Cheers, Kent.