Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] Adding support for Microchip Sparx5 SoC

[Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:30 PM Lars Povlsen
<lars.povlsen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Alexandre Belloni writes:
> > As Arnd stated, he already applied the patches so you have to send an
> > incremental patch to fix the clock driver.
> >
>
> I actually wrote Arnd about this specifically, and he replied that a
> patch against either next or mainline was fine - so that's why I
> refreshed the lot (Including Reviewed-by: headers).

I think I misunderstood your question. To clarify: Alexandre is right,
you should not resend patches that have already been merged but
instead send the incremental patches if you need further changes.

I thought your question was about the case where your patch
series has conflicts against another unrelated set of changes
that may have been merged already.

> But I will send an incremental patch just in case, no problem.

Thanks,

      Arnd