Hi Drew, thanks for this patch, we're going the right direction here and creating things that are generically useful. On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 5:53 PM Drew Fustini <drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > pin 103 (PIN103) GPIO-113 44e1099c 00000027 pinctrl-single > pin 104 (PIN104) GPIO-114 44e109a0 0000002c pinctrl-single (...) Uh oh, that is the global GPIO number that we want to get rid of. > + gpio_num = 0; > + list_for_each_entry(range, &pctldev->gpio_ranges, node) { > + if ((pin >= range->pin_base) && > + (pin < (range->pin_base + range->npins))) > + gpio_num = range->base + (pin - range->pin_base); There should be a break; here should it not? > + } > + > + if (gpio_num > 0) > + seq_printf(s, "GPIO-%u ", gpio_num); Can we print the gpio_chip name and offset instead? I want to discourage the world from thinking about these global GPIO numbers. You can fetch the gpio_chip for the range pretty easily with struct gpio_chip *chip = gpio_to_chip(gpio_num); Also notice that this code needs to be #ifdef CONFIG_GPIOLIB somehow (maybe IS_ENABLED() works) because there are pin controllers in use without gpiolib believe it or not. Yours, Linus Walleij