On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:32 AM Maulik Shah <mkshah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> msmgpio irqchip is not using return value of irq_set_wake call.
> Start using it.
>
> Fixes: e35a6ae0eb3a ("pinctrl/msm: Setup GPIO chip in hierarchy")
> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Is this something that's causing regressions so I should apply it for
fixes, or is it fine to keep this with the rest of the series for v5.9?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] pinctrl: qcom: Use return value from irq_set_wake call
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] pinctrl: qcom: Use return value from irq_set_wake call
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 15:18:46 +0200
- In-reply-to: <1592818308-23001-4-git-send-email-mkshah@codeaurora.org>
- References: <1592818308-23001-1-git-send-email-mkshah@codeaurora.org> <1592818308-23001-4-git-send-email-mkshah@codeaurora.org>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] pinctrl: qcom: Use return value from irq_set_wake call
- From: Doug Anderson
- Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] pinctrl: qcom: Use return value from irq_set_wake call
- References:
- [PATCH v3 0/5] irqchip: qcom: pdc: Introduce irq_set_wake call
- From: Maulik Shah
- [PATCH v3 3/5] pinctrl: qcom: Use return value from irq_set_wake call
- From: Maulik Shah
- [PATCH v3 0/5] irqchip: qcom: pdc: Introduce irq_set_wake call
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 16/25] arch: arm: mach-at91: pm: Move prototypes to mutually included header
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: pinctrl: add bindings for MediaTek MT6779 SoC
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] pinctrl: qcom: Use return value from irq_set_wake call
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] pinctrl: qcom: Use return value from irq_set_wake call
- Index(es):
 |