Re: [PATCH v2] [RFC] dt-bindings: gpio: introduce hog properties with less ambiguity

[Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 7:57 AM Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> For active low lines the semantic of output-low and output-high is hard
> to grasp because there is a double negation involved and so output-low
> is actually a request to drive the line high (aka inactive).
>
> So introduce output-inactive and output-active with the same semantic as
> output-low and output-high respectively have today, but with a more
> sensible name.

I guess someone needs to proofread the GPIO in-kernel documentation
and update it accordingly. We have a lot of references to logical vs.
physical state AFAIR.


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko