Alexandre, On Wed, 08 Jul 2020 05:57:24 +0100, kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [1 <text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)>] > Hi Alexandre, > > I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: > > [auto build test WARNING on stm32/stm32-next] > [also build test WARNING on soc/for-next v5.8-rc4 next-20200707] > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use as documented in > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Alexandre-Torgue/irqchip-stm32-exti-map-direct-event-to-irq-parent/20200706-161327 > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/atorgue/stm32.git stm32-next > config: arm-randconfig-s031-20200707 (attached as .config) > compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0 > reproduce: > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > # apt-get install sparse > # sparse version: v0.6.2-31-gabbfd661-dirty > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' ARCH=arm > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > In file included from include/linux/build_bug.h:5, > from include/linux/bits.h:23, > from include/linux/bitops.h:5, > from drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c:8: > drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c: In function 'stm32_exti_h_domain_alloc': > drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c:683:23: warning: comparison of unsigned expression >= 0 is always true [-Wtype-limits] > 683 | if (desc->irq_parent >= 0) { > | ^~ > include/linux/compiler.h:58:52: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if_var' > 58 | #define __trace_if_var(cond) (__builtin_constant_p(cond) ? (cond) : __trace_if_value(cond)) > | ^~~~ > >> drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c:683:2: note: in expansion of macro 'if' > 683 | if (desc->irq_parent >= 0) { Do you plan to address this? Looks like an actual bug to me. M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.