Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpio: add GPO driver for PCA9570

Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> · Tue, 30 Jun 2020 11:18:35 +0200

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:58 AM Sungbo Eo <mans0n@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> NXP PCA9570 is 4-bit I2C GPO expander without interrupt functionality.
> Its ports are controlled only by a data byte without register address.
>
> As there is no other driver similar enough to be adapted for it, a new
> driver is introduced here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sungbo Eo <mans0n@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Sungbo,

on top of Andy's review, here are some more nits I spotted.

> ---
> v2:
> * move the direction functions below the set functions
> * use devm_gpiochip_add_data() and remove the remove callback
>
> v1:
> Tested in kernel 5.4 on an ipq40xx platform.
>
> This is my first time submitting a whole driver patch, and I'm not really familiar with this PCA expander series.
> Please let me know how I can improve this patch further.
>
> FYI there's an unmerged patch for this chip.
> http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/driverdev-devel/2017-May/105602.html
> I don't have PCA9571 either so I didn't add support for it.
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/Kconfig        |   8 ++
>  drivers/gpio/Makefile       |   1 +
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-pca9570.c | 148 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 157 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpio-pca9570.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> index c6b5c65c8405..d10dcb81b841 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> @@ -962,6 +962,14 @@ config GPIO_PCA953X_IRQ
>           Say yes here to enable the pca953x to be used as an interrupt
>           controller. It requires the driver to be built in the kernel.
>
> +config GPIO_PCA9570
> +       tristate "PCA9570 4-Bit I2C GPO expander"
> +       help
> +         Say yes here to enable the GPO driver for the NXP PCA9570 chip.
> +
> +         To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will
> +         be called gpio-pca9570.
> +
>  config GPIO_PCF857X
>         tristate "PCF857x, PCA{85,96}7x, and MAX732[89] I2C GPIO expanders"
>         select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Makefile b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> index 1e4894e0bf0f..33cb40c28a61 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_OCTEON)           += gpio-octeon.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_OMAP)                        += gpio-omap.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_PALMAS)              += gpio-palmas.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_PCA953X)             += gpio-pca953x.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_PCA9570)             += gpio-pca9570.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_PCF857X)             += gpio-pcf857x.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_PCH)                 += gpio-pch.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_PCIE_IDIO_24)                += gpio-pcie-idio-24.o
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca9570.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca9570.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e6b6c4e791c0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca9570.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Driver for PCA9570 I2C GPO expander
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2020 Sungbo Eo <mans0n@xxxxxxxxxx>
> + *
> + * Based on gpio-tpic2810.c
> + * Copyright (C) 2015 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/
> + *     Andrew F. Davis <afd@xxxxxx>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> +
> +/**
> + * struct pca9570 - GPIO driver data
> + * @chip: GPIO controller chip
> + * @client: I2C device pointer
> + * @buffer: Buffer for device register
> + * @lock: Protects write sequences
> + */
> +struct pca9570 {
> +       struct gpio_chip chip;
> +       struct i2c_client *client;
> +       u8 buffer;

Could you rename it to reg or something else more obvious? A buffer
can be for anything.

> +       struct mutex lock;
> +};
> +
> +static void pca9570_set_mask_bits(struct gpio_chip *chip, u8 mask, u8 bits)
> +{
> +       struct pca9570 *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +       u8 buffer;
> +       int err;
> +
> +       mutex_lock(&gpio->lock);
> +
> +       buffer = gpio->buffer & ~mask;
> +       buffer |= (mask & bits);
> +
> +       err = i2c_smbus_write_byte(gpio->client, buffer);
> +       if (!err)
> +               gpio->buffer = buffer;
> +
> +       mutex_unlock(&gpio->lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void pca9570_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int value)
> +{
> +       pca9570_set_mask_bits(chip, BIT(offset), value ? BIT(offset) : 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void pca9570_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned long *mask,
> +                                unsigned long *bits)
> +{
> +       pca9570_set_mask_bits(chip, *mask, *bits);
> +}
> +
> +static int pca9570_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> +                                unsigned offset)
> +{
> +       /* This device always output */
> +       return GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_OUT;
> +}
> +
> +static int pca9570_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> +                                  unsigned offset)
> +{
> +       /* This device is output only */
> +       return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static int pca9570_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> +                                   unsigned offset, int value)
> +{
> +       /* This device always output */
> +       pca9570_set(chip, offset, value);
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct gpio_chip template_chip = {
> +       .label                  = "pca9570",
> +       .owner                  = THIS_MODULE,
> +       .get_direction          = pca9570_get_direction,
> +       .direction_input        = pca9570_direction_input,
> +       .direction_output       = pca9570_direction_output,
> +       .set                    = pca9570_set,
> +       .set_multiple           = pca9570_set_multiple,
> +       .base                   = -1,
> +       .ngpio                  = 4,
> +       .can_sleep              = true,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id pca9570_of_match_table[] = {
> +       { .compatible = "nxp,pca9570" },
> +       { /* sentinel */ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pca9570_of_match_table);

If you're not using it in probe than maybe move it next to the I2C device table?

> +
> +static int pca9570_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> +                        const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> +{
> +       struct pca9570 *gpio;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       gpio = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*gpio), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!gpio)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       i2c_set_clientdata(client, gpio);
> +
> +       gpio->chip = template_chip;
> +       gpio->chip.parent = &client->dev;
> +
> +       gpio->client = client;
> +
> +       mutex_init(&gpio->lock);
> +
> +       ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&client->dev, &gpio->chip, gpio);
> +       if (ret < 0) {
> +               dev_err(&client->dev, "Unable to register gpiochip\n");

You don't need this message, the core library will print something for
you. Just do return devm_gpiochip_add_data().

> +               return ret;
> +       }
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct i2c_device_id pca9570_id_table[] = {
> +       { "pca9570", },
> +       { /* sentinel */ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, pca9570_id_table);
> +
> +static struct i2c_driver pca9570_driver = {
> +       .driver = {
> +               .name = "pca9570",
> +               .of_match_table = pca9570_of_match_table,
> +       },
> +       .probe = pca9570_probe,
> +       .remove = pca9570_remove,
> +       .id_table = pca9570_id_table,
> +};
> +module_i2c_driver(pca9570_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Sungbo Eo <mans0n@xxxxxxxxxx>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("GPIO expander driver for PCA9570");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> --

Bart