On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 07:11:49PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > It looks like the put_device (line 891) should be one line earlier. > Yikes - thanks for that. I'll be sure to coccinelle my code before submitting from now on. Cheers, Kent.
Re: [PATCH 16/22] gpiolib: cdev: add V2 uAPI implementation to parity with V1 (fwd)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/22] gpiolib: cdev: add V2 uAPI implementation to parity with V1 (fwd)
- From: Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 10:07:31 +0800
- In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2006231910320.2367@hadrien>
- References: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2006231910320.2367@hadrien>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 16/22] gpiolib: cdev: add V2 uAPI implementation to parity with V1
- Next by Date: [PATCH V6 0/9] Support i.MX8 SoCs pinctrl drivers built as module
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 16/22] gpiolib: cdev: add V2 uAPI implementation to parity with V1 (fwd)
- Next by thread: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 12/24] pinctrl: qcom: spmi-gpio: fix warning about irq chip reusage
- Index(es):
 |