On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 05:01:17PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote: > Am 2020-06-09 16:42, schrieb Mark Brown: > > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 04:38:31PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote: > > > > > mfd-device@10 { > > > compatible = "simple-regmap", "simple-mfd"; > > > reg = <10>; > > > regmap,reg-bits = <8>; > > > regmap,val-bits = <8>; > > > sub-device@0 { > > > compatible = "vendor,sub-device0"; > > > reg = <0>; > > > }; > > > > A DT binding like this is not a good idea, encoding the details of the > > register map into the DT binding makes it an ABI which is begging for > > trouble. I'd also suggest that any device using a generic driver like > > this should have a specific compatible string for the device so we can > > go back and add quirks later if we need them. > > Like in the spidev case, yes. But OTOH if I _just_ encode the parameters > for the regmap a MFD, Lee don't agree because its just a shim. So either > way I seem to be stuck here. > > Where should I put the code to create an i2c driver, init a regmap and > populate its childen? Find another driver doing this already and rename it 'simple-mfd' (no relation to the DT binding) and add your compatible string to it. 'Generic' or 'simple' drivers don't require generic/simple DT bindings. Or extend the existing syscon driver to look up the bus_type and create the regmap based on the bus type? Rob