On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 2:17 AM Drew Fustini <drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Does this appear to be a reasonable solution? > > I would appreciate any comments. Looks reasonable to me. I suggest you send a proper patch. Tony? Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: pinctrl-single: num_maps in generic pinconf support?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: pinctrl-single: num_maps in generic pinconf support?
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 14:09:30 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20200531001709.GA168774@x1>
- References: <20200526122133.GA1454440@x1> <20200529175544.GA3766151@x1> <20200531001709.GA168774@x1>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: pinctrl-single: num_maps in generic pinconf support?
- From: Drew Fustini
- Re: pinctrl-single: num_maps in generic pinconf support?
- References:
- Re: pinctrl-single: num_maps in generic pinconf support?
- From: Drew Fustini
- Re: pinctrl-single: num_maps in generic pinconf support?
- From: Drew Fustini
- Re: pinctrl-single: num_maps in generic pinconf support?
- Prev by Date: Re: gpiolib: Add some warn print for easier to debug
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Revert "pinctrl: freescale: imx: Use 'devm_of_iomap()' to avoid a resource leak in case of error in 'imx_pinctrl_probe()'"
- Previous by thread: Re: pinctrl-single: num_maps in generic pinconf support?
- Next by thread: Re: pinctrl-single: num_maps in generic pinconf support?
- Index(es):
 |