Re: [PATCH v1 3/5] gpio: pca953x: Drop unneeded ACPI_PTR()

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 12:19:14AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> ACPI_PTR() becomes a no-op when !CONFIG_ACPI. This is not needed since
> we always have ID table enabled. Moreover, in the mentioned case compiler
> will complain about defined but not used variable.

Bart, are you going to apply this one, or should I resend it as a part of v2?

> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
> index 4bb3d3524bc7..1fca8dd7824f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
> @@ -1176,7 +1176,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver pca953x_driver = {
>  		.name	= "pca953x",
>  		.pm	= &pca953x_pm_ops,
>  		.of_match_table = pca953x_dt_ids,
> -		.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(pca953x_acpi_ids),
> +		.acpi_match_table = pca953x_acpi_ids,
>  	},
>  	.probe		= pca953x_probe,
>  	.remove		= pca953x_remove,
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko