On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 2:24 AM Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The legacy defines GPIOF_DIR_XXX are only for consumers. Document the > proper ones. Also: don't use "_XXX" since that's harder to find with > "git grep". Just list both of the values. > > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Patch applied! Sorry for the historical confusion. Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: Document proper return value for gpio drivers
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: Document proper return value for gpio drivers
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 14:16:05 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20200428172322.1.I396f351e364f3c09df7c7606e79abefb8682c092@changeid>
- References: <20200428172322.1.I396f351e364f3c09df7c7606e79abefb8682c092@changeid>
- References:
- [PATCH 1/2] gpio: Document proper return value for gpio drivers
- From: Douglas Anderson
- [PATCH 1/2] gpio: Document proper return value for gpio drivers
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] usb: serial: xr_serial: Add gpiochip support
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: Make "offset" and "unsigned int", not just "unsigned"
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: Make "offset" and "unsigned int", not just "unsigned"
- Next by thread: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel-vbtn: Use acpi_evaluate_integer()
- Index(es):
 |