On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 7:49 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Use BIT() and GENMASK() where it's appropriate. > At the same time drop it where it's not appropriate. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v2: update one more macro (all IRQ settings are plain numbers, not bits) I managed to extract this v2 series with b4 and applied it. I don't know if you planned to send a pull request for the PCH changes, it was so simple to just use b4 that I tested it on this patch series and it just worked. Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] gpio: pch: Use BIT() and GENMASK() where it's appropriate
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] gpio: pch: Use BIT() and GENMASK() where it's appropriate
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 10:27:40 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20200414174900.5099-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References: <20200414174900.5099-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] gpio: pch: Use BIT() and GENMASK() where it's appropriate
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] gpio: pch: Use BIT() and GENMASK() where it's appropriate
- References:
- [PATCH v2 1/4] gpio: pch: Use BIT() and GENMASK() where it's appropriate
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v2 1/4] gpio: pch: Use BIT() and GENMASK() where it's appropriate
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/6] PWM fan support on Clearfog gt8k
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: sunxi: handle probe defferal
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v2 3/4] gpio: pch: Refactor pch_irq_type() to avoid unnecessary locking
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] gpio: pch: Use BIT() and GENMASK() where it's appropriate
- Index(es):
 |