wt., 14 kwi 2020 o 14:00 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:31 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > We must not call pinctrl_gpio_can_use_line() with the gpio_lock taken > > as it takes a mutex internally. Let's move the call before taking the > > spinlock and store the return value. > > > > This isn't perfect - there's a moment between calling > > pinctrl_gpio_can_use_line() and taking the spinlock where the situation > > can change but it isn't a regression either: previously this part wasn't > > protected at all and it only affects the information user-space is > > seeing. > > > > Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Fixes: d2ac25798208 ("gpiolib: provide a dedicated function for setting lineinfo") > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > I'm sorry that I lost track of this patch :( > > Do we still need something like this or has it been fixed > by some other patches? > > Yours, > Linus Walleij Nope, this is still an issue. Do you have a better idea than mine? Bart