On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 02:18:20PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Few drivers are using the same flag to tell Intel pin control core > how to interpret GPIO base. > > Provide a generic flags so all drivers can use. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] pinctrl: intel: Introduce common flags for GPIO mapping scheme
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] pinctrl: intel: Introduce common flags for GPIO mapping scheme
- From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:48:53 +0300
- In-reply-to: <20200413111825.89866-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- Ironport-sdr: PBBCaPDCfhI+020Qp7zKlW6qgWMOg4LYPnKMH8P+22CvQum7wkcDjViiS/JCqTaLm9TZQA5DOD CutesV9M7TQA==
- Ironport-sdr: au3s3YbgXCKTXLvnjCJ9GN4xnSeZon1evXhGTvk3mS/YA2omsn0sN6fKj6FtBvvLpsKClyJgVB YHtpQLk8BYDA==
- Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
- References: <20200413111825.89866-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v2 1/6] pinctrl: intel: Introduce common flags for GPIO mapping scheme
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v2 1/6] pinctrl: intel: Introduce common flags for GPIO mapping scheme
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] irq/irq_sim: try to improve the API
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] pinctrl: cannonlake: Use generic flag for special GPIO base treatment
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] pinctrl: tigerlake: Use generic flag for special GPIO base treatment
- Next by thread: [PATCH] of_device: removed #include that caused a recursion in included headers
- Index(es):
 |