> I guess this answers the question in the previous thread. > To be clear, scrap your patch and don't touch just gpio-ml-ioh alone. > Basically it should be one patch to get rid the driver. Sure! Will work on it. -- Vaibhav Gupta > > JFYI, I will send couple of clean ups against gpio-pch.
Re: [PATCH v1] gpio: Extend TODO to cover code duplication avoidance
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] gpio: Extend TODO to cover code duplication avoidance
- From: Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 01:47:52 +0530
- In-reply-to: <20200402200955.GD1922688@smile.fi.intel.com>
- References: <20200402192145.17239-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <CAP+cEOO-G=4_txK3dtOxOoRS51GWBzEwa5FfpRzYxDKHo=MdiA@mail.gmail.com> <20200402200955.GD1922688@smile.fi.intel.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v1] gpio: Extend TODO to cover code duplication avoidance
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH v1] gpio: Extend TODO to cover code duplication avoidance
- From: Vaibhav Gupta
- Re: [PATCH v1] gpio: Extend TODO to cover code duplication avoidance
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v1] gpio: Extend TODO to cover code duplication avoidance
- Prev by Date: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v1] gpio: ml: ioh: Convert to dev_pm_ops
- Next by Date: [PATCH v1 1/2] gpio: pch: Use BIT() and GENMASK() where it's appropriate
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v1] gpio: Extend TODO to cover code duplication avoidance
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v1] gpio: Extend TODO to cover code duplication avoidance
- Index(es):
 |