On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 10:05 PM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx> > > The gpiochip_generic_request() and gpiochip_generic_free() functions can > now deal properly with chips that don't have any pin-ranges defined, so > they can be assigned unconditionally. > > Suggested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx> Patch applied. Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: Unconditionally assign .request()/.free()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: Unconditionally assign .request()/.free()
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 09:16:49 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20200401200527.2982450-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com>
- References: <20200401200527.2982450-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com>
- References:
- [PATCH 1/2] gpio: Unconditionally assign .request()/.free()
- From: Thierry Reding
- [PATCH 1/2] gpio: Unconditionally assign .request()/.free()
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: Unconditionally assign .request()/.free()
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: Unconditionally assign .request()/.free()
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: Unconditionally assign .request()/.free()
- Next by thread: [GIT PULL] bulk pin control changes for v5.7
- Index(es):
 |