Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: iio/accel: Drop duplicate adi, adxl345/6 from trivial-devices.yaml

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 2:22 PM Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob.
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:05:38PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > The 'adi,adxl345' definition is a duplicate as there's a full binding in:
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/adi,adxl345.yaml
> >
> > The trivial-devices binding doesn't capture that 'adi,adxl346' has a
> > fallback compatible 'adi,adxl345', so let's add it to adi,adxl345.yaml.
> >
> > Cc: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@xxxxxx>
> > Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/adi,adxl345.yaml     | 10 +++++++---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trivial-devices.yaml |  4 ----
> >  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/adi,adxl345.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/adi,adxl345.yaml
> > index c602b6fe1c0c..d124eba1ce54 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/adi,adxl345.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/adi,adxl345.yaml
> > @@ -17,9 +17,13 @@ description: |
> >
> >  properties:
> >    compatible:
> > -    enum:
> > -      - adi,adxl345
> > -      - adi,adxl375
> > +    oneOf:
> > +      - items:
> > +          - const: adi,adxl346
> > +          - const: adi,adxl345
> > +      - enum:
> > +          - adi,adxl345
> > +          - adi,adxl375
>
> I assume it is my schema understanding that is poor.
> But I cannot parse the above.
>
> The mix of items, enum and const confuses me.

compatible can be one of 3 possibilities:
"adi,adxl346", "adi,adxl345"
"adi,adxl345"
"adi,adxl375"

For a single entry, 'items' can be omitted.

> I guess that if I am confused then others may end in the same situation.
> Can we improve readability here or amybe add a comment?

example-schema.yaml explains this to some extent. I'd rather improve that.

Rob



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux