pt., 6 mar 2020 o 14:23 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > The implementation if .irq_disable() which kicks in between > the gpiolib and the driver is not properly mimicking the > expected semantics of the irqchip core: the irqchip will > call .irq_disable() if that exists, else it will call > mask_irq() which first checks if .irq_mask() is defined > before calling it. > > Since we are calling it unconditionally, we get this bug > from drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-ssbi-gpio.c, as it only > defines .irq_mask_ack and not .irq_mask: > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 > pgd = (ptrval) > (...) > PC is at 0x0 > LR is at gpiochip_irq_disable+0x20/0x30 > > Fix this by only calling .irq_mask() if it exists. > > Cc: Brian Masney <masneyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fixes: 461c1a7d4733 ("gpiolib: override irq_enable/disable") > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 9 ++++++++- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > index bdbc1649eafa..d0bb962f42d5 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > @@ -2169,9 +2169,16 @@ static void gpiochip_irq_disable(struct irq_data *d) > { > struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); > > + /* > + * Since we override .irq_disable() we need to mimic the > + * behaviour of __irq_disable() in irq/chip.c. > + * First call .irq_disable() if it exists, else mimic the > + * behaviour of mask_irq() which calls .irq_mask() if > + * it exists. > + */ > if (chip->irq.irq_disable) > chip->irq.irq_disable(d); > - else > + else if (chip->irq.chip->irq_mask) > chip->irq.chip->irq_mask(d); > gpiochip_disable_irq(chip, d->hwirq); > } > -- > 2.24.1 > Reviewed-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>