Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: Guard irq_eoi()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Linus Walleij (2020-03-06 04:12:21)
> In the commit setting up the qcom/msm pin controller to
> be hierarchical some callbacks were careful to check that
> d->parent_data on irq_data was valid before calling the
> parent function, however irq_chip_eoi_parent() was called
> unconditionally which doesn't work with elder Qualcomm
> platforms such as APQ8060.
> 
> When the drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8xxx.c driver calls
> chained_irq_exit() that call will in turn call chip->irq_eoi()
> which is set to irq_chip_eoi_parent() by default on a
> hierachical IRQ chip, and the parent is pinctrl-msm.c
> so that will in turn unconditionally call
> irq_chip_eoi_parent() again, but its parent is invalid
> so we get the following crash:
> 
>  Unnable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
>  virtual address 00000010
>  pgd = (ptrval)
>  [00000010] *pgd=00000000
>  Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] PREEMPT SMP ARM
>  (...)
>  PC is at irq_chip_eoi_parent+0x4/0x10
>  LR is at pm8xxx_irq_handler+0x1b4/0x2d8
> 
> Implement a local stub just avoiding to call down to
> irq_chip_eoi_parent() if d->parent_data is not set.
> 
> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Lina Iyer <ilina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fixes: e35a6ae0eb3a ("pinctrl/msm: Setup GPIO chip in hierarchy")
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux