Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpio: of: Extract of_gpiochip_add_hog()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/21/20 11:18 AM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> Hi Linus, Rob,
> 
> On 2/21/20 10:08 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 2:01 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
>> <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Extract the code to add all GPIO hogs of a gpio-hog node into its own
>>> function, so it can be reused.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> v2:
>>>   - No changes.
>>
>> Patch applied with Frank's Review tag.
> 
> I created a devicetree unittest to show the problem that Geert's patches
> fix.

I left out the link to my patch series:

   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/1582224021-12827-1-git-send-email-frowand.list@xxxxxxxxx/

   [PATCH v2 0/2] of: unittest: add overlay gpio test to catch gpio hog problem

-Frank

> 
> I would prefer to have my unittest patch series applied somewhere,
> immediately followed by Geert's patch series.  This way, after
> applying my series, a test fail is reported, then after Geert's
> series is applied, the test fail becomes a test pass.
> 
> Can you coordinate with Rob to accept both series either via
> your tree or Rob's tree?
> 
> -Frank
> 
>>
>> Yours,
>> Linus Walleij
>>
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux