On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 10:33 PM Samuel Holland <samuel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The pin controller hardware does not distinguish IRQs intended for > wakeup from other IRQs, so we must mask non-wakeup IRQs in software to > prevent inadvertent wakeups. This is accomplished at the irqchip level > via the IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND flag. > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Patch applied. Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: sunxi: Mask non-wakeup IRQs on suspend
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: sunxi: Mask non-wakeup IRQs on suspend
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:15:51 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20200117213340.47714-2-samuel@sholland.org>
- References: <20200117213340.47714-1-samuel@sholland.org> <20200117213340.47714-2-samuel@sholland.org>
- References:
- [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: sunxi: Forward calls to irq_set_irq_wake
- From: Samuel Holland
- [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: sunxi: Mask non-wakeup IRQs on suspend
- From: Samuel Holland
- [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: sunxi: Forward calls to irq_set_irq_wake
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: sunxi: Forward calls to irq_set_irq_wake
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3] pinctrl: Use new GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: sunxi: Mask non-wakeup IRQs on suspend
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: sunxi: Forward calls to irq_set_irq_wake
- Index(es):
 |