On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 09:28:14AM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 12:18 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 6:33 PM Russell King - ARM Linux admin > > <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > It seems that sometime between 4.20 and 5.5, something has broken the > > > ability to specify gpio-hogs in DT for GPIOs that are written around > > > pinctrl drivers. > > (explanation that makes perfect sense) > > > Consequently, adding a gpio-hog to DT for this driver results in the > > > driver endlessly returning -EPROBE_DEFER. > > > > I suspect this is sx150x-specific and suspect these two commits: > > > > 1a1d39e1b8dd pinctrl: sx150x: Register pinctrl before adding the gpiochip > > b930151e5b55 pinctrl: sx150x: Add a static gpio/pinctrl pin range mapping > > > > I suppose people weren't using hogs very much with the sx150x and > > it didn't turn up in testing so far. > > > > I don't think for example pinctrl-stmfx.c has this problem, as it registers > > the pin ranges from the device tree as part of the core code. > > But other drivers calling gpiochip_add_pin_range() may be experiencing > > this. > > > > Peter/Andrey, do you have some idea? Have you tested this usecase (hogs) > > with the sx150x? > > > > Haven't done any GPIO hogging on sx150x, unfortunately. My use-cases were: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-zii-dev-rev-c.dts > > and > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-zii-scu4-aib.dts > > which didn't have any hogs so far (there's a chance Russell is using > the former for his experiments, so maybe that'll change). I don't any > useful input on this regression, sorry. I do have Rev C. board readily > available, so I can provide Tested-by's if I am CC'd on fixes. The ZII dev rev C is where I had the hog as a means of kicking the 88x3310 PHY out of reset. I've now converted it to a proper MDIO bus-level reset, so I no longer have the hog, and I no longer care about the regression - but that's not to say it shouldn't be fixed, as the code is wrong. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up