On 2/18/20 7:10 PM, Alexandre Torgue wrote: > Hi Marek Hi, > On 2/18/20 5:25 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 2/18/20 2:12 PM, Alexandre Torgue wrote: >>> This series adds the possibility to handle gpio interrupts on level. >>> >>> GPIO hardware block is directly linked to EXTI block but EXTI handles >>> external interrupts only on edge. To be able to handle GPIO interrupt on >>> level a "hack" is done in gpio irq chip: parent interrupt (exti irq >>> chip) >>> is retriggered following interrupt type and gpio line value. >>> >>> In exti irq chip, retrigger ops function is added. >> >> btw. this might be unrelated, but is it possible to have e.g. gpioC2 set >> as trigger-level-low and gpioD2 set as trigger-edge-falling ? It seems >> 8eb2dfee9fb1 ("pinctrl: stm32: add lock mechanism for irqmux selection") >> prevents that. >> > > No it's not possible. Each gpio line doesn't have a dedicated Exti line > Each Exti line is muxing between gpio banks. OK, that confirms my assumption. > Mapping is done as following: > > EXTI0 = A0 or B0 or C0 .... or Z0 : selected by Mux > EXTI1 = A1 or B1 or C1 ....or Z1 : selected by Mux > EXTI2 = A2 or B2 or C2 ....or Z2 : selected by Mux > ... Is it at least possible to have IRQs of the same type on the same exti line? E.g. gpioA2 of trigger-edge-falling and gpioB2 trigger-edge-falling ?