Care is taken with "index", however with the current version the actual xgpio_writereg is using index for data but xgpio_regoffset(chip, i) for the offset. And since i is already incremented it is incorrect. This patch fixes it so that index is used for the offset too. Signed-off-by: Paul Thomas <pthomas8589@xxxxxxxxx> --- There are many different ways to correct this, I'd just like it to get fixed. I've tested this with a 5.2 kernel, but this patch is against 5.5rc7. drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c index a9748b5198e6..67f9f82e0db0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c @@ -147,9 +147,10 @@ static void xgpio_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned long *mask, for (i = 0; i < gc->ngpio; i++) { if (*mask == 0) break; + /* Once finished with an index write it out to the register */ if (index != xgpio_index(chip, i)) { xgpio_writereg(chip->regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET + - xgpio_regoffset(chip, i), + index * XGPIO_CHANNEL_OFFSET, chip->gpio_state[index]); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock[index], flags); index = xgpio_index(chip, i); @@ -165,7 +166,7 @@ static void xgpio_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned long *mask, } xgpio_writereg(chip->regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET + - xgpio_regoffset(chip, i), chip->gpio_state[index]); + index * XGPIO_CHANNEL_OFFSET, chip->gpio_state[index]); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock[index], flags); } -- 2.17.1