pon., 20 sty 2020 o 09:44 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > Hi Bartosz, > > On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 1:08 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Instead of calling the gpiochip's set_config() callback directly and > > checking its existence every time - just add a new routine that performs > > this check internally. Call it in gpio_set_config() and > > gpiod_set_transitory(). Also call it in gpiod_set_debounce() and drop > > the check for chip->set() as it's irrelevant to this config option. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> > [snip!] > > These two lines are not equivalent: the new code no longer uses the > packed value of mode and arg! > Hence this leads to subsequent cleanups in commits e5e42ad224a040f9 > ("gpiolib: remove set but not used variable 'config'") and d18fddff061d2796 > ("gpiolib: Remove duplicated function gpio_do_set_config()"). > > However, what was the purpose of the PIN_CONF_PACKED() translation? > Why is it no longer needed? > Thanks for catching this. I was OoO for a couple days. I'll try to get through the mail today and address this as well. Bartosz