Hi Linus, > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: mvebu: armada-37xx: use use platform api Would you pick this patch up? Per Uwe, this v1 patch use %pe is better that v2 use %d. Thanks, Peng. > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> > > platform_irq_count() and platform_get_irq() is the more generic way > (independent of device trees) to determine the count of available interrupts. > So use this instead. > > As platform_irq_count() might return an error code (which of_irq_count > doesn't) some additional handling is necessary. > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c | 12 +++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c > b/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c > index aa9dcde0f069..cc66a6429a06 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c > @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ > #include <linux/of.h> > #include <linux/of_address.h> > #include <linux/of_device.h> > -#include <linux/of_irq.h> > #include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h> #include > <linux/pinctrl/pinconf.h> #include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h> @@ -739,7 > +738,14 @@ static int armada_37xx_irqchip_register(struct platform_device > *pdev, > return ret; > } > > - nr_irq_parent = of_irq_count(np); > + nr_irq_parent = platform_irq_count(pdev); > + if (nr_irq_parent < 0) { > + if (nr_irq_parent != -EPROBE_DEFER) > + dev_err(dev, "Couldn't determine irq count: %pe\n", > + ERR_PTR(nr_irq_parent)); > + return nr_irq_parent; > + } > + > spin_lock_init(&info->irq_lock); > > if (!nr_irq_parent) { > @@ -776,7 +782,7 @@ static int armada_37xx_irqchip_register(struct > platform_device *pdev, > if (!girq->parents) > return -ENOMEM; > for (i = 0; i < nr_irq_parent; i++) { > - int irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, i); > + int irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, i); > > if (irq < 0) > continue; > -- > 2.16.4