wt., 7 sty 2020 o 08:46 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > I'm happy with a (static) GPIO hog. > > BTW, what exactly do you mean with "mux framework"? Pinctrl/pinmux? > No, I meant the multiplexer subsystem under drivers/mux. I thought we could call mux_control_select() from pm_runtime_get_*() or something similar. This is just an idea though, and I see Frank already did an in-depth analysis so never mind my comment. Bart
Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/2] gpio: of: Add DT overlay support for GPIO hogs
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/2] gpio: of: Add DT overlay support for GPIO hogs
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 10:03:27 +0100
- In-reply-to: <CAMuHMdVo7bvCKjn2-SD4j7EPwDPeTWn2Sh2e-Moj+RkqudZGuQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20191230133852.5890-1-geert+renesas@glider.be> <CAMpxmJVN3f5vWZoUpgsM0kocmBYSO=T0OeoG--5rQi9=jk2t2g@mail.gmail.com> <CAMuHMdVo7bvCKjn2-SD4j7EPwDPeTWn2Sh2e-Moj+RkqudZGuQ@mail.gmail.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/2] gpio: of: Add DT overlay support for GPIO hogs
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/2] gpio: of: Add DT overlay support for GPIO hogs
- References:
- [PATCH/RFC 0/2] gpio: of: Add DT overlay support for GPIO hogs
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/2] gpio: of: Add DT overlay support for GPIO hogs
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski
- Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/2] gpio: of: Add DT overlay support for GPIO hogs
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven
- [PATCH/RFC 0/2] gpio: of: Add DT overlay support for GPIO hogs
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] gpio: gpio-grgpio: fix possible sleep-in-atomic-context bugs in grgpio_remove()
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] dt-bindings: gpio: Add gpio-repeater bindings
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/2] gpio: of: Add DT overlay support for GPIO hogs
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/2] gpio: of: Add DT overlay support for GPIO hogs
- Index(es):
 |