Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: qcom: Add ipq6018 Global Clock Controller support

[kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Sricharan,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on clk/clk-next]
[also build test WARNING on v5.5-rc4 next-20191220]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Sricharan-R/Add-Global-clock-controller-support-for-IPQ6018/20200104-133041
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git clk-next
reproduce:
        # apt-get install sparse
        # sparse version: v0.6.1-129-g341daf20-dirty
        make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
        make C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__'

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

>> drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq6018.c:2623:17: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lpass_core_axim_clk_src' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq6018.c:2642:17: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lpass_snoc_cfg_clk_src' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq6018.c:2661:17: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lpass_q6_axim_clk_src' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq6018.c:2674:17: sparse: sparse: symbol 'ftbl_rbcpr_wcss_clk_src' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq6018.c:2680:17: sparse: sparse: symbol 'rbcpr_wcss_clk_src' was not declared. Should it be static?

Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                 Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@xxxxxxxxxxxx Intel Corporation