Re: [PATCH v7 02/12] dt-bindings: mfd: Document ROHM BD71828 bindings

["Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2019-12-19 at 14:36 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Dec 2019, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> 
> > Hello Mark, Lee, Rob
> > 
> > I just noticed we have a dependency here. This binding is referring
> > to
> > regulator binding - which was applied by Mark and is thus missing
> > from
> > the series. What's the best way forward?
> > 
> > On Thu, 2019-12-19 at 11:46 +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > > ROHM BD71828 Power management IC integrates 7 buck converters, 7
> > > LDOs,
> > > a real-time clock (RTC), 3 GPO/regulator control pins, HALL input
> > > and a 32.768 kHz clock gate.
> > > 
> > > Document the dt bindings drivers are using.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > No changes since v6
> > 
> > //snip
> > 
> > > +  regulators:
> > > +    $ref: ../regulator/rohm,bd71828-regulator.yaml
> > 
> > This file is missing from the series and is applied to Mark's tree.
> 
> Shouldn't matter.  I guess they're all heading for he same release.
> 
Ok. Thanks for clarification. I was asking this because Rob asked me to
reorder the patches a few versions ago so that the dt_binding_check
Make target would not be broken between commits. He asked me to submit
the regulator and LED bindings first and MFD (which refers to those)
only after them. Thus I was wondering if the final merge order of MFD
and regulator trees is such that it can result the breakage Rob hoped
to avoid. But I am more than glad if the series can go in like this :)

Thanks again for all the help guys :)

Br,
	Matti