Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] pinctrl: baytrail: Clean up (part 3)

[Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 11:26 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This is a part 3 of clean up pin control driver for Intel Baytrail.
> After this applied the driver will use all available data structures
> from pinctrl-intel.h header.
>
> Note, that patch which exposes common pin control data structrure for drivers
> will be used by Lynxpoint as well.
>
> This has been tested on the tablet with SD card detection and buttons pressed.
>
> Based on our pinctrl/intel for-next branch.

The series:
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>

Please collect up what you have and send this with a pull
request so I have the full picture in my tree soon-ish.

The reason is that I want a clean baseline to deal with this:

$ git grep gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip drivers/pinctrl/
drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c:
gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip(gc, &byt_irqchip,
drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-cherryview.c:
gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip(chip, &pctrl->irqchip, irq,
drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c:
gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip(&pctrl->chip, &pctrl->irqchip, irq,
NULL);

If you volunteer to get rid of these three gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip()
calls, even better :D

They are the three last users before I can delete
gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip() from the kernel.

Yours,
Linus Walleij