śr., 11 gru 2019 o 10:49 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 10:30:33AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > śr., 4 gru 2019 o 11:09 Uwe Kleine-König > > <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 09:24:39AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote: > > > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > platform_irq_count() is the more generic way (independent of > > > > device trees) to determine the count of available interrupts. So > > > > use this instead. > > > > > > > > As platform_irq_count() might return an error code (which > > > > of_irq_count doesn't) some additional handling is necessary. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > > > > > V3: > > > > Use %pe > > > > > > Great. Note that with %pe there is a dependency on commit 57f5677e535b > > > ("printf: add support for printing symbolic error names") which was > > > applied during the current merge window. > > > > > > > Why would %pe be better in this case? The function returned an int - > > why convert it to a pointer? > > The conversion to a pointer is (currently still) needed, because there > is no printk facility (yet) that consumes an int error pointer and > results in the respecting code. > > Somewhere on my todo-list is an item to fix that, but we're not there > yet and so the best option is to use %pe. > Fair enough, I wasn't aware of this new format modifier. Both applied. Bartosz