On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 03:11:12PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > wt., 10 gru 2019 o 03:15 Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > > > Restore the external behavior of gpio-mockup to what it was prior to the > > change to using GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > Fix a regression introduced in v5.5-rc1. > > > > The change to GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION reversed the polarity of the > > dir field within gpio-mockup.c, but overlooked inverting the value on > > initialization and when returned by gpio_mockup_get_direction. > > The latter is a bug. > > The former is a problem for tests which assume initial conditions, > > specifically the mockup used to initialize chips with all lines as inputs. > > That superficially appeared to be the case after the previous patch due > > to the bug in gpio_mockup_get_direction. > > > > drivers/gpio/gpio-mockup.c | 7 +++++-- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mockup.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mockup.c > > index 56d647a30e3e..c4fdc192ea4e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mockup.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mockup.c > > @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static int gpio_mockup_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset) > > int direction; > > > > mutex_lock(&chip->lock); > > - direction = !chip->lines[offset].dir; > > + direction = chip->lines[offset].dir; > > mutex_unlock(&chip->lock); > > > > return direction; > > @@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ static int gpio_mockup_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > struct gpio_chip *gc; > > struct device *dev; > > const char *name; > > - int rv, base; > > + int rv, base, i; > > u16 ngpio; > > > > dev = &pdev->dev; > > @@ -447,6 +447,9 @@ static int gpio_mockup_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > if (!chip->lines) > > return -ENOMEM; > > > > + for (i = 0; i < gc->ngpio; i++) > > + chip->lines[i].dir = GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_IN; > > + > > if (device_property_read_bool(dev, "named-gpio-lines")) { > > rv = gpio_mockup_name_lines(dev, chip); > > if (rv) > > -- > > 2.24.0 > > > > Hi Kent, > > I was applying and testing your libgpiod series and noticed that the > gpio-tools tests fail after applying patches 16 & 17 (with linux > v5.5-rc1). Is this fix related to this? > I don't think so. I've only been able to trip this problem with a couple of corner cases in my Go uapi test suite. I have been unable to reproduce it with the tools as it requires multiple requests with the same chip fd, including an as-is, to trip. And running the libgpiod tests against v5.5-rc1 works for me. Can you provide more details as to the errors you are seeing? Btw, I was writing tests for your LINEINFO_WATCH patch v2, which I was applying to v5.5-rc1, when I ran across this. That works ok if I __packed the changed struct. And I can confirm that patch v2 doesn't isolate watches on different chip fds. Kent.