On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 3:45 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > czw., 5 gru 2019 o 11:21 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 11:28 AM Bartosz Golaszewski > > <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > śr., 4 gru 2019 o 23:30 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 6:02 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > + if (desc->name) { > > > > > + strncpy(info->name, desc->name, sizeof(info->name)); > > > > > + info->name[sizeof(info->name) - 1] = '\0'; > > > > > + } else { > > > > > + info->name[0] = '\0'; > > > > > + } > > > > > + > > > > > + if (desc->label) { > > > > > + strncpy(info->consumer, desc->label, sizeof(info->consumer)); > > > > > + info->consumer[sizeof(info->consumer) - 1] = '\0'; > > > > > + } else { > > > > > + info->consumer[0] = '\0'; > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > I think we have to fix GCC warnings first and then do whatever this patch does. > > > > > > > > > > What GCC warnings are you referring to exactly? > > > > stncpy() against partial string without NUL-terminator. > > > > So, if desc->label is longer than info->consumer, it will be copied > > partially. I don't check if the modern GCC clever enough to see the > > next operation which does the termination. > > > > I'm not sure I get it. What warnings does it produce and in what > environment? Some kind of warning: ‘strncpy’ specified bound 16 equals destination size [-Wstringop-truncation] > I don't see any. Good, I just checked and see none as well. It means GCC understands that strncpy() is followed by guaranteed NUL-termination. > If you want it simpler - we can do `snprintf(info->consumer, > sizeof(info->consumer), desc->label ?: "")`. It makes sense only in above context. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko