Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] gpiolib: add new ioctl() for monitoring changes in line info

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



czw., 5 gru 2019 o 11:27 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> napisał(a):
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 11:42 AM Bartosz Golaszewski
> <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > śr., 4 gru 2019 o 23:34 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> napisał(a):
> > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 6:03 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > > +struct gpioline_info_changed {
> > > > +       __u64 timestamp;
> > > > +       __u32 event_type;
> > > > +       struct gpioline_info info;
> > > > +       __u32 padding[4]; /* for future use */
> > > > +};
> > >
> > > Has this been tested against 64-bit kernel / 32-bit userspace case?
> > >
> >
> > No. Since this is a new thing - do you think it's possible to simply
> > arrange the fields or add padding such that the problem doesn't even
> > appear in the first place?
>
> Yes. this can be done, though be careful about potential endianess
> issues (the ABI must be tested on BE as well).
>
> So, the test cases, I can imagine of, should include (k - kernel, u - user):
> - 64k-64u: LE and BE
> - 64k-32u: LE and BE
> - 32k-32u: LE and BE

I usually use qemu VMs built with yocto for testing but I don't see
any way of creating a 32-bit user-space with 64-bit kernel. Any ideas
on how to prepare a testing environment?

Bart

>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux