śr., 4 gru 2019 o 19:47 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 05:33:04PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > śr., 4 gru 2019 o 08:24 Uwe Kleine-König > > <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 04:20:41AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote: > > > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > platform_irq_count() is the more generic way (independent of > > > > device trees) to determine the count of available interrupts. So > > > > use this instead. > > > > > > > > As platform_irq_count() might return an error code (which > > > > of_irq_count doesn't) some additional handling is necessary. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> > > > Reviewed-and-Commit-Log-Provided-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > This is not a valid tag, but I take it as Suggested-by and Reviewed-by. :) > > If you care about the validity of such tags, I suggest you take a look > at the output of > > $ git rev-list v4.0..v5.4 | while read rev; do git cat-file commit $rev; done | sed -n 's/ *\(.*-by\):.*/\1/p' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n > > (which finds all tags used between 4.0 and 5.4 with its usage count). > > A few of the tags (admittedly with low usage count :-) included there are: > > Badly-reviewed-by > Bonus-points-awarded-by > Compile-tested and Reviewed-by > Enthusiastically-Acked-by > Mea-culpa-by > \o/-by > Brown-paper-bag-by > > Best regards > Uwe I am well aware of this and there has been a discussion on LKML some time ago (I can no longer find it though) about introducing stricter rules for tags. I don't remember the outcome either though. Bart