Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: bcm-kona: use platform_irq_count

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 06:04:27AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Use platform_irq_count to replace of_irq_count
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> V1:
>  Code inspection, not tested
> 
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> index 4122683eb1f9..c50721980a7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
>  #include <linux/io.h>
>  #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> -#include <linux/of_irq.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>  #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
> @@ -586,7 +585,7 @@ static int bcm_kona_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	kona_gpio->gpio_chip = template_chip;
>  	chip = &kona_gpio->gpio_chip;
> -	kona_gpio->num_bank = of_irq_count(dev->of_node);
> +	kona_gpio->num_bank = platform_irq_count(pdev);

of_irq_count returns 0 or a positive int while platform_irq_count might
return a negative error code. This needs handling. Also I wonder why
platform_irq_count() is better than of_irq_count() which would be good
to describe in the commit log.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux