Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: sh-pfc: Make legacy function GPIO handling less fragile

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Geert,

Thanks for your work.

On 2019-11-13 11:18:09 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> If there are no function GPIOs, sh_pfc_register_gpiochip() returns early
> with a success indicator.  This is fragile, as new code may be added
> after the #ifdef block, which won't be executed in case of early return.
> 
> Invert the logic, so the code always continues until the end of the
> function on success.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> To be queued in sh-pfc-for-v5.6.
> 
>  drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/gpio.c | 11 +++++------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/gpio.c
> index 5a55b8da7919520e..8213e118aa408573 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/gpio.c
> @@ -386,12 +386,11 @@ int sh_pfc_register_gpiochip(struct sh_pfc *pfc)
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Register the function GPIOs chip. */
> -	if (pfc->info->nr_func_gpios == 0)
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	chip = sh_pfc_add_gpiochip(pfc, gpio_function_setup, NULL);
> -	if (IS_ERR(chip))
> -		return PTR_ERR(chip);
> +	if (pfc->info->nr_func_gpios) {
> +		chip = sh_pfc_add_gpiochip(pfc, gpio_function_setup, NULL);
> +		if (IS_ERR(chip))
> +			return PTR_ERR(chip);
> +	}
>  #endif /* CONFIG_PINCTRL_SH_FUNC_GPIO */
>  
>  	return 0;
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

-- 
Regards,
Niklas Söderlund



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux