śr., 13 lis 2019 o 09:44 Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > The comment should have been removed when new GPIO direction > definitions were taken in use as the function logic was changed. It > is now perfectly valid and Ok to hit the return from the bottom of > the direction getting function. > > Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Sorry guys. Just noticed that I should've removed this comment in > original patch series. > > drivers/gpio/gpio-mmio.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mmio.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mmio.c > index cd07c948649f..f729e3e9e983 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mmio.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mmio.c > @@ -386,7 +386,6 @@ static int bgpio_get_dir(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio) > if (!(gc->read_reg(gc->reg_dir_in) & bgpio_line2mask(gc, gpio))) > return GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_OUT; > > - /* This should not happen */ > return GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_IN; > } > > > base-commit: 70d97e099bb426ecb3ad4bf31e88dbf2ef4b2e4c > -- > 2.21.0 > > > -- > Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers > ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC > Kiviharjunlenkki 1E > 90220 OULU > FINLAND > > ~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~ > Simon says - in Latin please. > ~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~ > Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =] Queued for v5.5, thanks! Bartosz