Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: Do not use platform_get_irq() to count interrupts

[Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Linus,

On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 2:35 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 2:07 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 4:26 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
> > <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > As platform_get_irq() now prints an error when the interrupt does not
> > > exist, counting interrupts by looping until failure causes the printing
> > > of scary messages like:
> > >
> > >     sh-pfc e6060000.pin-controller: IRQ index 0 not found
> > >
> > > Fix this by using the platform_irq_count() helper instead.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 7723f4c5ecdb8d83 ("driver core: platform: Add an error message to platform_get_irq*()")
> > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Tested-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > v2:
> > >   - Add Reviewed-by, Tested-by.
> > >
> > > Linus: Can you please take this one, as it is a fix for v5.4? Thx!
> >
> > I'm not sure the little error message counts as
> > a regression, certainly users can live with it.
>
> Several similar fixes have already made it upstream.
> But the decision is up to you.
>
> > Can't you just put it in your queue for the next kernel?
>
> Sure, will do (after ELC-E), if you prefer.

Queuing in sh-pfc-for-v5.5.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds