pon., 14 paź 2019 o 14:55 Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 02:38:38PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > sob., 12 paź 2019 o 03:57 Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > > > > > This patch prevents pull up/down flags being applied to as-is line > > > requests, which should be left as-is, and for output mode for which > > > setting pulls is not currently supported. > > > > > > > This again looks like it should be done right in patch 1/6 instead of > > being fixed later in the same series. Or is there some reason to do it > > this way I'm not seeing? > > > The patch series adds full support for pull up/down in stages - in order > of increasing level of controversy, at least IMHO. > That way you can drop the more contraversial components if you disagree > with them by rejecting individual patches, and most likely all the > ones that follow. > I will not - and I think Linus will agree on that - apply half a series when it addresses the user API. We need to be very precise about what changes will be merged and the patches must be well organized logically. For instance: the commit message of this patch makes me think that it fixes an issue introduced in an earlier patch in this very series. Unless that's not true - in which case the commit message should be reworded - it's not acceptable. Bart > And I certainly wasn't going to bundle everything into Drew's patch. > > Cheers, > Kent. >