Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] gpiolib: pull requires explicit input mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



pon., 14 paź 2019 o 14:55 Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> napisał(a):
>
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 02:38:38PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > sob., 12 paź 2019 o 03:57 Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> napisał(a):
> > >
> > > This patch prevents pull up/down flags being applied to as-is line
> > > requests, which should be left as-is, and for output mode for which
> > > setting pulls is not currently supported.
> > >
> >
> > This again looks like it should be done right in patch 1/6 instead of
> > being fixed later in the same series. Or is there some reason to do it
> > this way I'm not seeing?
> >
> The patch series adds full support for pull up/down in stages - in order
> of increasing level of controversy, at least IMHO.
> That way you can drop the more contraversial components if you disagree
> with them by rejecting individual patches, and most likely all the
> ones that follow.
>

I will not - and I think Linus will agree on that - apply half a
series when it addresses the user API. We need to be very precise
about what changes will be merged and the patches must be well
organized logically.

For instance: the commit message of this patch makes me think that it
fixes an issue introduced in an earlier patch in this very series.
Unless that's not true - in which case the commit message should be
reworded - it's not acceptable.

Bart

> And I certainly wasn't going to bundle everything into Drew's patch.
>
> Cheers,
> Kent.
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux