On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 8:15 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sorry for the late feedback, but I'm still not sure whether this patch > is on track to be applied or not. I had thought not, at least not yet, > but just in case... > > You have added the flags to linehandle_create, but not lineevent_create. > Given that your primary use case is push buttons, isn't the event request > at least as important as the handle request? Even ignoring your use > case, I'd add them to lineevent_create just to maintain symmetry. > > Also, is it valid to set PULL_UP and PULL_DOWN simulaneously? > I would think not, but I could be wrong. > If not then that combination should be rejected with EINVAL. Kent and Bart - thanks for the review. I've added setting the pull-up/down flags in lineevent_create(). And I have added sanity checks to make pull-up and pull-down flags mutually exclusive and only valid when the line is an input. I tried to use "git send-email" to reply to your message but it doesn't work seem to have threaded correctly, despite using "--in-reply-to" I have only submitted kernel patches before when I was completing the Eudyptula Challenge, so I wasn't sure how to best post a follow-up patch to address review feedback. Maybe starting a new thread with v2 of the RFC? thanks, drew