On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 10:56:18PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > wt., 8 paź 2019 o 08:15 Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 12:25:23PM +0200, Drew Fustini wrote: > > > Add pull-up/pull-down flags to the gpio line get and > > > set ioctl() calls. Use cases include a push button > > > that does not have an external resistor. > > > > > > Addition use cases described by Limor Fried (ladyada) of > > > Adafruit in this PR for Adafruit_Blinka Python lib: > > > https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_Blinka/pull/59 > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Drew Fustini <drew@xxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > > > include/uapi/linux/gpio.h | 4 ++++ > > > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > > > index d9074191edef..9da1093cc7f5 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > > > @@ -427,6 +427,8 @@ struct linehandle_state { > > > (GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_INPUT | \ > > > GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_OUTPUT | \ > > > GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_ACTIVE_LOW | \ > > > + GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_PULL_UP | \ > > > + GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_PULL_DOWN | \ > > > GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_OPEN_DRAIN | \ > > > GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_OPEN_SOURCE) > > > > > > @@ -598,6 +600,10 @@ static int linehandle_create(struct gpio_device *gdev, void __user *ip) > > > set_bit(FLAG_OPEN_DRAIN, &desc->flags); > > > if (lflags & GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_OPEN_SOURCE) > > > set_bit(FLAG_OPEN_SOURCE, &desc->flags); > > > + if (lflags & GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_PULL_DOWN) > > > + set_bit(FLAG_PULL_DOWN, &desc->flags); > > > + if (lflags & GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_PULL_UP) > > > + set_bit(FLAG_PULL_UP, &desc->flags); > > > > > > ret = gpiod_set_transitory(desc, false); > > > if (ret < 0) > > > @@ -1102,6 +1108,10 @@ static long gpio_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) > > > if (test_bit(FLAG_OPEN_SOURCE, &desc->flags)) > > > lineinfo.flags |= (GPIOLINE_FLAG_OPEN_SOURCE | > > > GPIOLINE_FLAG_IS_OUT); > > > + if (test_bit(FLAG_PULL_DOWN, &desc->flags)) > > > + lineinfo.flags |= GPIOLINE_FLAG_PULL_DOWN; > > > + if (test_bit(FLAG_PULL_UP, &desc->flags)) > > > + lineinfo.flags |= GPIOLINE_FLAG_PULL_UP; > > > > > > if (copy_to_user(ip, &lineinfo, sizeof(lineinfo))) > > > return -EFAULT; > > > @@ -2475,6 +2485,8 @@ static bool gpiod_free_commit(struct gpio_desc *desc) > > > clear_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags); > > > clear_bit(FLAG_OPEN_DRAIN, &desc->flags); > > > clear_bit(FLAG_OPEN_SOURCE, &desc->flags); > > > + clear_bit(FLAG_PULL_UP, &desc->flags); > > > + clear_bit(FLAG_PULL_DOWN, &desc->flags); > > > clear_bit(FLAG_IS_HOGGED, &desc->flags); > > > ret = true; > > > } > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/gpio.h b/include/uapi/linux/gpio.h > > > index 4ebfe0ac6c5b..c2d1f7d908d6 100644 > > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/gpio.h > > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/gpio.h > > > @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ struct gpiochip_info { > > > #define GPIOLINE_FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW (1UL << 2) > > > #define GPIOLINE_FLAG_OPEN_DRAIN (1UL << 3) > > > #define GPIOLINE_FLAG_OPEN_SOURCE (1UL << 4) > > > +#define GPIOLINE_FLAG_PULL_UP (1UL << 5) > > > +#define GPIOLINE_FLAG_PULL_DOWN (1UL << 6) > > > > > > /** > > > * struct gpioline_info - Information about a certain GPIO line > > > @@ -62,6 +64,8 @@ struct gpioline_info { > > > #define GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_ACTIVE_LOW (1UL << 2) > > > #define GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_OPEN_DRAIN (1UL << 3) > > > #define GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_OPEN_SOURCE (1UL << 4) > > > +#define GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_PULL_UP (1UL << 5) > > > +#define GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_PULL_DOWN (1UL << 6) > > > > > > /** > > > * struct gpiohandle_request - Information about a GPIO handle request > > > -- > > > 2.20.1 > > > > > Sorry for the late feedback, but I'm still not sure whether this patch > > is on track to be applied or not. I had thought not, at least not yet, > > but just in case... > > > > It still needs some fixes, but Linus seems to be fine with the general idea. > > > You have added the flags to linehandle_create, but not lineevent_create. > > Given that your primary use case is push buttons, isn't the event request > > at least as important as the handle request? Even ignoring your use > > case, I'd add them to lineevent_create just to maintain symmetry. > > > > Also, is it valid to set PULL_UP and PULL_DOWN simulaneously? > > I would think not, but I could be wrong. > > If not then that combination should be rejected with EINVAL. > > > > Yes, some validity checks of the flags must be added. I even did it in > my local branch[1]. > Your changes for linehandle_create look ok, but for lineevent_create you explicitly disabled PULL_UP and PULL_DOWN, and in a block labelled "This is just wrong: we don't look for events on output lines" at that. > Re: direction and configuration changes on requested lines: I think > it's quite useful to add in the form of a new ioctl(): > GPIOHANDLE_SET_CONFIG_IOCTL or something. I started hacking on this > but eventually got more busy this week than I anticipated. I'm still > planning on sending an RFC by the end of the week though. > I have the reverse problem - bored and looking for something to do, so more than willing to help out - if you want it. And while we're talking, does the gpio-mockup support pull up/down being set from the kernel side? Cheers, Kent. > > [1] https://github.com/brgl/linux/commit/82fc38f6ab599ee03f7a8ed078de8abb41e6e611 > > > Cheers, > > Kent.