[PATCH v3 7/8] gpio: mvebu: use devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname()

[Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>]

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Use devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname() instead of calling
platform_get_resource_byname() and devm_ioremap_resource() separately.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c | 19 +++++++------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
index 6c0687694341..2f0f50336b9a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
@@ -773,23 +773,12 @@ static int mvebu_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct mvebu_pwm *mvpwm;
-	struct resource *res;
 	u32 set;
 
 	if (!of_device_is_compatible(mvchip->chip.of_node,
 				     "marvell,armada-370-gpio"))
 		return 0;
 
-	/*
-	 * There are only two sets of PWM configuration registers for
-	 * all the GPIO lines on those SoCs which this driver reserves
-	 * for the first two GPIO chips. So if the resource is missing
-	 * we can't treat it as an error.
-	 */
-	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "pwm");
-	if (!res)
-		return 0;
-
 	if (IS_ERR(mvchip->clk))
 		return PTR_ERR(mvchip->clk);
 
@@ -812,7 +801,13 @@ static int mvebu_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	mvchip->mvpwm = mvpwm;
 	mvpwm->mvchip = mvchip;
 
-	mvpwm->membase = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
+	/*
+	 * There are only two sets of PWM configuration registers for
+	 * all the GPIO lines on those SoCs which this driver reserves
+	 * for the first two GPIO chips. So if the resource is missing
+	 * we can't treat it as an error.
+	 */
+	mvpwm->membase = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "pwm");
 	if (IS_ERR(mvpwm->membase))
 		return PTR_ERR(mvpwm->membase);
 
-- 
2.23.0