On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 08:22:38PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > devm_fwnode_get_index_gpiod_from_child() is too long, besides the fwnode > in question does not have to be a child of device node. Let's rename it > to devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index() and keep the old name for compatibility > for now. Shouldn't we convert all the users and drop that monstrosity devm_fwnode_get_index_gpiod_from_child() completely?
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpiolib: introduce devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpiolib: introduce devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index()
- From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 12:40:07 +0300
- In-reply-to: <20190913032240.50333-2-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
- Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
- References: <20190913032240.50333-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> <20190913032240.50333-2-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpiolib: introduce devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index()
- From: Dmitry Torokhov
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpiolib: introduce devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index()
- References:
- [PATCH v2 0/2] Add support for software nodes to gpiolib
- From: Dmitry Torokhov
- [PATCH v2 1/2] gpiolib: introduce devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index()
- From: Dmitry Torokhov
- [PATCH v2 0/2] Add support for software nodes to gpiolib
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] pinctrl: Add new pinctrl/GPIO driver
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] gpiolib: introduce fwnode_gpiod_get_index()
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpiolib: introduce devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index()
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpiolib: introduce devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index()
- Index(es):
 |