On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 04:44:29PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:41:43AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:51 AM Dmitry Torokhov > > <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > If we are willing to sacrifice the custom label for the GPIO that > > > fwnode_gpiod_get_index() allows us to set, then there are several > > > drivers that could actually use gpiod_get() API. > > > > We have: > > gpiod_set_consumer_name(gpiod, "name"); > > to deal with that so no sacrifice is needed. > > Thank for this hint! Would it be possible to improve your email etiquette, and move this discussion to a more appropriate subject line, so I don't have to keep checking these emails, in case you _do_ talk about something relevent to the original patch that the subject line refers to? Thanks. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up