Re: [PATCH] gpio: Initialize the irqchip valid_mask with a callback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 04:01:04PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c
> index 07050cdbadb9..a3109bcaa0ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c
> @@ -214,6 +214,17 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops tqmx86_gpio_dev_pm_ops = {
>  			   tqmx86_gpio_runtime_resume, NULL)
>  };
>  
> +static void tqmx86_init_irq_valid_mask(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> +				       unsigned long *valid_mask,
> +				       unsigned int ngpios)
> +{
> +	/* Only GPIOs 4-7 are valid for interrupts. Clear the others */
> +	clear_bit(0, valid_mask);
> +	clear_bit(1, valid_mask);
> +	clear_bit(2, valid_mask);
> +	clear_bit(3, valid_mask);
> +}

Hi Linus

The change looks good. But a minor naming nit-pick. The code here
assumes valid_mask has already been initialised, all valid gpios have
had their bit set to 1 by the core. What we are actually doing here is
masking the mask to fit the hardware.

So maybe a better name would be tqmx86_mask_irq_valid_mask()?

For gpio-tqmx86.c
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>

    Andrew



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux