On Wed, 2019-09-04 at 19:30 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 9:14 AM Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > The ast2600 has two gpio controllers, one for 3.6V GPIOS and one > > for 1.8V GPIOS. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@xxxxxxxxx> > > - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(aspeed_gpio_banks); i++) { > > + banks = (gpio->config->nr_gpios >> 5) + 1; > > Same comment as per the other patch. > > > + for (i = 0; i < banks; i++) { > > +static const struct aspeed_bank_props ast2600_bank_props[] = { > > + /* input output */ > > + {5, 0xffffffff, 0x0000ffff}, /* U/V/W/X */ > > + {6, 0xffff0000, 0x0fff0000}, /* Y/Z */ > > Perhaps GENMASK() for all values? Perhaps this and your other comments below would be best addressed in an additional cleanup patch? This patch follows the formatting of the existing code and it's not very clean to differ from that or to change the formatting of the current code in this patch. > > > + { }, > > Comma is not needed here. > > > +}; > > + > > +static const struct aspeed_gpio_config ast2600_config = > > + /* 208 3.6V GPIOs */ > > + { .nr_gpios = 208, .props = ast2600_bank_props, }; > > Seems curly braces missed their places. > > > +static const struct aspeed_bank_props ast2600_1_8v_bank_props[] = > > { > > + /* input output */ > > + {1, 0x0000000f, 0x0000000f}, /* E */ > > GENMASK()? > > > + { }, > > No comma. > > > +}; > > +static const struct aspeed_gpio_config ast2600_1_8v_config = > > + /* 36 1.8V GPIOs */ > > + { .nr_gpios = 36, .props = ast2600_1_8v_bank_props, }; > > Location of the curly braces? >