Re: [PATCH] gpio: Move gpiochip_lock/unlock_as_irq to gpio/driver.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 5:19 AM YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If CONFIG_GPIOLIB is not, gpiochip_lock/unlock_as_irq will
> conflict as this:
>
> In file included from sound/soc/codecs/wm5100.c:18:0:
> ./include/linux/gpio.h:224:19: error: static declaration of gpiochip_lock_as_irq follows non-static declaration
>  static inline int gpiochip_lock_as_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip,
>                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from sound/soc/codecs/wm5100.c:17:0:
> ./include/linux/gpio/driver.h:494:5: note: previous declaration of gpiochip_lock_as_irq was here
>  int gpiochip_lock_as_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset);
>      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from sound/soc/codecs/wm5100.c:18:0:
> ./include/linux/gpio.h:231:20: error: static declaration of gpiochip_unlock_as_irq follows non-static declaration
>  static inline void gpiochip_unlock_as_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip,
>                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from sound/soc/codecs/wm5100.c:17:0:
> ./include/linux/gpio/driver.h:495:6: note: previous declaration of gpiochip_unlock_as_irq was here
>  void gpiochip_unlock_as_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset);
>      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Move them to gpio/driver.h and use CONFIG_GPIOLIB guard this.
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: d74be6dfea1b ("gpio: remove gpiod_lock/unlock_as_irq()")
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx>

Patch applied with some fuzzing.

Yours,
Linus Walleij



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux